That is why free and liberal societies ensure the best manifesto for their law and law makers. That can last for decades without need of change. A sustainable policy, promising results. Otherwise polarity can rip apart a society. Let’s talk about conservative and liberal bipolarity.

A universal standard always helps see a bigger bigger, because often times when you look around the world, the need to compare becomes irrefutable. So let’s say Britain has achieved a social justice system of number 10, while somewhere else the world is stuck at 0.1. This polarity is the reason there are migrations, because wanting freedom is natural human will.

So at a point where highly cultured nations reach a universal standard, of course there’s always room to look forward from there too. But without letting the world catch on, further advance only means increasing the polarity. I’ve seen these expressions even in scriptures where God condemned nations for greed, impatience and ingratitude. As I’ve stressed before, these things happen part of a natural process, as an outcome

So there are aspects of freedom. When social freedom, political and religious freedom has reached saturation, there are other aspects of life in which liberalism can advance. So for instance, so developed and highly thought, when will a time arrive when Britain will think about human genetic experiments?

These are indicators. Of course, if Britain does it today, it will be taboo. But when the world average has recieved number 7 as the global average, then some liberal nation will eventually start thinking, now we have the advancement, tools and equipment to consider a change that was previously radical. Like once upon a time what was known as necromancy, today it is happening all the time in morgues and is known as dissection.

You have never looked at all these polarities from an alien’s mindset. So while the world’s fighting about religious differences, there could be someone telling you language divide us all the time, more than religion. We are caught up in liberal and conservative debate, someone might tell you have no idea how much kilograms and pounds indirectly but eventually points out towards that. Like how the left and right handed-steering wheels.

So all these idea arise from the liberal edge. They don’t have to be just political. While the conservative edge is mostly thought as political, but it is the exact front that’s scrutinizing the society for common matches, like a united language, faith or theory. It is not my or your idea, it is something that’s deeply interwoven into human wiring and is constantly at work with or without you knowing. We are always outcome of patterns and algorithms at work. It is written, in human code.

We think consensus is an agreement, where in truth it is just an arrival. We cannot turn away from truth.

When a social system is built on error, that’s why there’s always room for amendments in the constitutions. So either a social system improves as a part of precautionary measures so people’s right to say cannot be stolen or rights are stolen and precautions are then taken so the definition of rights cannot be changed again. For instance, the social system of China.

So what’s with universal standard and the next part of the title? Prevention is better than cure, when not, prevention is taken as cure.