Q46:9 vs Q33:40

In 46.9 he clearly admits, he is not something of original, certainly not the last prophet. And he does not know what will be done with him or those who follow him.

In 33.40, he admits that he is not father of any of men, and that made him think there will be no prophet after him. Like saying the sun won’t rise after I die.

You won’t find any truth in these verses beyond that. That is that.

The way two part verse is put together, is self-evident that it implies first part is conditional on second and second on first. He thought prophethood is continuation through male progeny.

He deprived people from son of God, God never gave him a son, out of revenge on God, he said that he was the final son. And even though by negativing, but Quran by mistake admitted, he had issues due to lack of a male inheritor.

He said in Quran, Jews say Ezra is son of God, Christans say Jesus is son of God… looks like he had problem with children of God. His philosophy emerged from lump of blood, and so being something like son of God, for him, he couldn’t saw it outside the sexual context. Which is further evident that he had multiple wives, and of very young age.

The very brick and bones of this faith was built on material things. Like their praying method. Let me tell you something, not as an information but as a verdict, worship is not duty, it is desire.

Put duty on worship, the desire is lost. Jizyakhor, the tax-collectors, made strict duty out of it like worships are five times tax they must pay to live a life with the peace of mind. Have good morals, you’ll always have peace of mind.

Leave a comment